HighIQCommunity.Com

4,246,543 words. 4,953 posts.

Ask Ethan: How Can A Nuclear Bomb Be Hotter Than The Center Of Our Sun?

by | Apr 4, 2020 | New, News

No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change the world.

— Robin Williams

The mushroom cloud resulting from the nuclear weapon test Bravo (yield 15 Mt) on Bikini Atoll. The test was part of the Operation Castle in 1954, and was one of the strongest (but not THE strongest) Hydrogen bombs ever detonated. In a hydrogen bomb explosion, nuclear fission compresses an internal pellet, which then undergoes nuclear fusion in a runaway, energy-releasing reaction. For some brief moments, the temperatures in there can exceed those in the center of the Sun. (U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY)

The center of our Sun tops out at 15 million K, but nuclear bombs can get nearly 20 times hotter. Here’s how.

In terms of raw energy output, nothing on our world compares to our Sun. Deep inside our Sun, nuclear fusion transform enormous quantities of hydrogen into helium, producing energy in the process. Every second, this fusion causes the Sun to burn through 700 million tons of fuel, much of which gets converted into energy via Einstein’s E = mc². Nothing on Earth can compare to this amount of energy. But in terms of temperature, we’ve got the Sun beat. That puzzles Paul Dean, who asks:

[T]he temperature in the core of our sun is usually cited at 15 million degrees Celsius or so. […] What I don’t get is this: some mid-sized thermonuclear test detonations done by the old Soviet Union and the USA have been recorded at (if only very briefly) 200 or even 300 million degrees Celsius. How can our pithy 3 stage hydrogen bomb blasts be so much hotter than the dense hell of the Sun’s monster fusion oven?

It’s a great question with a fascinating answer. Let’s find out.

The most straightforward and lowest-energy version of the proton-proton chain, which produces helium-4 from initial hydrogen fuel. This is the nuclear process that fuses hydrogen into helium in the Sun and all stars like it, and the net reaction converts a total of 0.7% of the mass of the initial (hydrogen) reactants into pure energy, while the remaining 99.3% of the mass is found in products such as helium-4. Similar reactions that convert light elements into heavier ones, releasing energy, are at play in fusion bombs on Earth, too. (WIKIMEDIA COMMONS USER SARANG)

The most powerful nuclear detonations on Earth and the interior of the Sun actually have a lot in common.

  1. They both get the overwhelming majority of their energy from nuclear fusion: compressing light nuclei into heavier ones.
  2. The process of fusion is energetically favorable, meaning that the products are lower in mass than the reactants.
  3. This mass difference means that the “missing mass” gets converted into energy via Einstein’s famous equation, E = mc².
  4. And this process, for as long as it endures, injects a tremendous amount of energy into a confined volume of space.

The physics that governs these nuclear reactions are the same regardless of where they take place: whether inside the Sun or in the critical core region of an atomic bomb explosion.

These four panels show the Trinity test explosion, the world’s first nuclear (fission) bomb, at a respective 16, 25, 53, and 100 milliseconds after ignition. The highest temperatures come in the earliest moments of ignition, before the volume of the explosion dramatically increases. (ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION)

The hottest part of any explosion occurs in the initial stages, when the majority of the energy gets released but remains in a very small volume of space. For the early, single-stage atomic bombs we had on Earth, that meant the initial detonation was where the highest temperatures occurred. Even a few fractions-of-a-second afterwards, the rapid, adiabatic expansion of the gas inside causes the temperature to drop dramatically.

But in a multi-stage atomic bomb, a small fission bomb is placed around material that’s suitable for nuclear fusion. The nuclear explosion compresses and heats the material inside, achieving the high temperatures and densities necessary to ignite that runaway nuclear reaction. When nuclear fusion occurs, even greater amounts of energy are released, epitomized by the Soviet Union’s 1960 detonation of the Tsar Bomba.

The 1961 Tsar Bomba explosion was the largest nuclear detonation ever to take place on Earth, and is perhaps the most famous example of a fusion weapon ever created, with a 50 megaton yield that far surpasses any other ever developed. (ANDY ZEIGERT / FLICKR)

It’s true: the hottest hydrogen bombs, leveraging the power of nuclear fusion, have indeed achieved temperatures of hundreds of millions of degrees Celsius. (Or kelvin, whose units we’ll use from now on.) By contrast, inside the Sun, the temperature is a relatively cool ~6,000 K at the edge of the photosphere, but rises as you travel down towards the Sun’s core through the various layers.

The majority of the Sun’s volume is composed of the radiative zone, where temperatures increase from the thousands into the millions of K. At some critical location, temperatures rise past a threshold of around 4 million K, which is the energy threshold necessary for nuclear fusion to begin. As you go closer towards the center, the temperature rises and rises, to a peak of 15 million K in the very center. This is the hottest temperature achieved in a star like our Sun.

This snippet of the ‘first light’ image released by NSF’s Inouye Solar Telescope shows the Texas-sized convective cells on the Sun’s surface in higher resolution than ever before. While the outer photosphere of the Sun may be at merely 6,000 K, the inner core reaches temperatures as high as 15,000,000 K. (NATIONAL SOLAR OBSERVATORY / AURA / NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION / INOUYE SOLAR TELESCOPE)

“How,” you might wonder, “can a miniature version of the Sun that only ignites for a fraction of a second reach higher temperatures than the very center of the Sun?”

And it’s a reasonable question to ask. If you look at total energy, there’s no comparison. The aforementioned Tsar Bomba, the largest nuclear explosion ever to take place on Earth, gave off the equivalent of 50 megatons of TNT: 210 petajoules of energy. On the other hand, the overwhelming majority of the Sun’s energy comes from the hottest regions; 99% of the Sun’s energy output comes from regions at 10 million K or hotter, despite the fact that such a region makes up only a small percentage of the core’s volume. The Sun emits the equivalent of 4 × 10²⁶ J of energy each second, by comparison, some 2 billion times more energy than the Tsar Bomba gave off.

This cutaway showcases the various regions of the surface and interior of the Sun, including the core, which is where nuclear fusion occurs. As time goes on, the helium-containing region in the core expands and the maximum temperature increases, causing the Sun’s energy output to increase. When our Sun runs out of hydrogen fuel in the core, it will contract and heat up to a sufficient degree that helium fusion can begin. (WIKIMEDIA COMMONS USER KELVINSONG)

With such enormous differences in energy, it might seem like a mistake to conclude that an atomic bomb’s temperature is many times higher than the center of the Sun. And yet, it isn’t all about energy. It’s not even about power, or the energy released in a given amount of time; the Sun has the atomic bomb beaten by a wide margin in that metric as well. Neither energy nor energy-per-unit-time can successfully explain why atomic bombs can reach higher temperatures than the Sun’s core.

But there is a physical explanation, and the way to see it for yourself is to think about the volume of the Sun. Yes, there’s an enormous amount of energy being emitted, but the Sun is huge. If we restrict ourselves to the core, even to the innermost, hottest region of the core, we’re still talking about enormous volumes of space, and that makes all the difference.

Despite things like flares, coronal mass ejections, sunspots, and other complex physics occurring in the outer layers, the Sun’s interior is relatively steady: producing fusion at a rate defined by its interior temperatures and densities at every internal layer. (NASA/SOLAR DYNAMICS OBSERVATORY (SDO) VIA GETTY IMAGES)

The majority of fusion occurs in the innermost 20–25% of the Sun, by radius. But that’s only about 1% of the Sun, by volume. Because the Sun is so enormous — its diameter is approximately 1,400,000 kilometers, or over 100 times the diameter of Earth — the total amount of energy and power it produces is spread out over an enormous volume. The key thing to look at isn’t just mass, energy, or power, but the density of those quantities.

For the very core of the Sun, where all of those quantities are at their highest, the Sun has:

  • a density of 150 grams-per-cubic-centimeter, about 150 times the density of water,
  • a power density of about 300 watts-per-cubic-meter, about the same power output as a warm-blooded human’s body heat,
  • and an energy density, as a result, that corresponds to a temperature of 15 million K.
The anatomy of the Sun, including the inner core, which is the only place where fusion occurs. Even at the incredible temperatures of 15 million K, the maximum achieved in the Sun, the Sun produces less energy-per-unit-volume than a typical human body. The Sun’s volume, however, is large enough to contain over 1⁰²⁸ full-grown humans, which is why even a low rate of energy production can lead to such an astronomical total energy output. (NASA/JENNY MOTTAR)

Over the volume of space that the Sun’s core comprises, that makes up a literally astronomical amount of mass, energy, and power. But in any particular region of space, the rate of fusion is relatively slow. Giving off 300 W of power per cubic meter is about the same amount of power that you give off throughout the day in terms of heat energy, burning through your chemical-based fuel to maintain your warm-blooded body temperature.

In terms of the amount of nuclear fusion per unit volume, that’s merely the equivalent of converting about 3 femtograms of mass (3 × 10^–18 kg) into energy each second for each cubic meter of space inside the Sun’s core. For comparison, the Tsar Bomba — whose explosion all occurred in a fraction-of-a-second within a volume less than one cubic meter — converted more than 2 kg of mass (about 5 pounds’ worth) into pure energy.

The Sun is the source of the overwhelming majority of light, heat, and energy on Earth’s surface, and is powered by nuclear fusion. But without the quantum rules that govern the Universe at a fundamental level, fusion wouldn’t be possible at all. (PUBLIC DOMAIN)

That’s the most important realization when it comes to understanding how a terrestrial nuclear explosion can reach higher temperatures, particularly over a very short time interval, than the hottest part of our Sun can. By almost every meaningful metric, the Sun far outclasses anything we can create on Earth, including mass, energy, volume, power, and the sustained output of what is produced.

But there are a few small but important ways that a nuclear explosion defeats the Sun. In particular:

  • the number of fusion reactions in a given amount of (small) volume is much greater,
  • these reactions take place over a much shorter amount of time on Earth than in the Sun,
  • and therefore, the total amount of energy released per unit volume is much larger.

For a very small amount of time, until adiabatic expansion causes the volume of the explosion to increase and the temperature to drop, a nuclear explosion can out-heat even the center of the Sun.

Nuclear weapon test Mike (yield 10.4 Mt) on Enewetak Atoll. The test was part of the Operation Ivy. Mike was the first hydrogen bomb ever tested. A release of this much energy corresponds to approximately 500 grams of matter being converted into pure energy: an astonishingly large explosion for such a tiny amount of mass. Nuclear reactions involving fission or fusion (or both, as in the case of Ivy Mike) can produce tremendously dangerous, long-term radioactive waste, but they also can produce temperatures exceeding those at the Sun’s center. (NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION / NEVADA SITE OFFICE)

The interior of the Sun is one of the most extreme places we can imagine. At temperatures of 15 million K and matter compressed to densities 150 times as great as liquid water on Earth, it’s hot and dense enough for nuclear fusion to proceed continuously, outputting 300 J of energy each second for every cubic meter of space. It’s a reaction that’s relentless and continuous, like a wood-fired oven except hotter, denser, and running on nuclear fuel.

But a multi-stage hydrogen bomb, where a fission bomb causes the inner core to compress, achieving higher densities from the compression than even at the Sun’s center. When the fusion reaction begins, those nuclear processes occurring at those extraordinary densities can lead to a chain reaction so powerful that, for a brief moment, the amount of heat-per-particle in a given volume exceeds that of the Sun. That’s how, here on Earth, we can produce something — albeit just for an instant — that truly is hotter than even the center of the Sun.

At the National Ignition Facility, omnidirectional high-powered lasers compress and heat a pellet of material to sufficient conditions to initiate nuclear fusion. A hydrogen bomb, where a nuclear fission reaction compresses the fuel pellet instead, is an even more extreme version of this, producing greater temperatures than even the center of the Sun. (DAMIEN JEMISON/LLNL)

Send in your Ask Ethan questions to startswithabang at gmail dot com!

Starts With A Bang is now on Forbes, and republished on Medium on a 7-day delay. Ethan has authored two books, Beyond The Galaxy, and Treknology: The Science of Star Trek from Tricorders to Warp Drive.

Ask Ethan: How Can A Nuclear Bomb Be Hotter Than The Center Of Our Sun? was originally published in Starts With A Bang! on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

View Original Article

Site VisitorsMap

Recent News

If Planet Nine Is Out There, It May Not Be Where We Think

Artist's impression of Planet Nine. (nagualdesign/Tom Ruen/ESO/Wikimedia Commons) SPACE If Planet Nine Is Out There, It May Not Be Where We Think MICHELLE STARR 15 APRIL 2021 If Planet Nine is out there, a large, mysterious planet lurking at the..

Site Statistics

301 registered users
4,246,543 words
4,953 posts, 2 comments
9247 images