HighIQCommunity.Com

4,765,342 words. 5,659 posts.

EVs Are Great, But ‘Active Travel’ Is The Best Way to Achieve Net-Zero Cities

by | Apr 4, 2021 | New, News

If you genuinely want something, don’t wait for it – – teach yourself to be impatient.

— Gurbaksh Chahal

(Guus Baggermans/Unsplash) ENVIRONMENT EVs Are Great, But 'Active Travel' Is The Best Way to Achieve Net-Zero Cities CHRISTIAN BRAND, THE CONVERSATION 4 APRIL 2021

Globally, only one in 50 new cars were fully electric in 2020, and one in 14 in the UK. Sounds impressive, but even if all new cars were electric now, it would still take 15-20 years to replace the world's fossil fuel car fleet.

The emission savings from replacing all those internal combustion engines with zero-carbon alternatives will not feed in fast enough to make the necessary difference in the time we can spare: the next five years. Tackling the climate and air pollution crises requires curbing all motorized transport, particularly private cars, as quickly as possible. Focusing solely on electric vehicles is slowing down the race to zero emissions.

This is partly because electric cars aren't truly zero-carbon – mining the raw materials for their batteries, manufacturing them, and generating the electricity they run on produces emissions.

Transport is one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonize due to its heavy fossil fuel use and reliance on carbon-intensive infrastructure – such as roads, airports, and the vehicles themselves – and the way it embeds car-dependent lifestyles.

One way to reduce transport emissions relatively quickly, and potentially globally, is to swap cars for cycling, e-biking, and walking – active travel, as it's called.

Active travel is cheaper, healthier, better for the environment, and no slower on congested urban streets. So how much carbon can it save on a daily basis? And what is its role in reducing emissions from transport overall?

In new research, colleagues and I reveal that people who walk or cycle have lower carbon footprints from daily travel, including in cities where lots of people are already doing this.

Despite the fact that some walking and cycling happens on top of motorized journeys instead of replacing them, more people switching to active travel would equate to lower carbon emissions from transport on a daily and trip-by-trip basis.

What a difference a trip makes

We observed around 4,000 people living in London, Antwerp, Barcelona, Vienna, Orebro, Rome, and Zurich. Over a two-year period, our participants completed 10,000 travel diary entries which served as records of all the trips they made each day, whether going to work by train, taking the kids to school by car, or riding the bus into town. For each trip, we calculated the carbon footprint.

Strikingly, people who cycled on a daily basis had 84 percent lower carbon emissions from all their daily travel than those who didn't.

We also found that the average person who shifted from car to bike for just one day a week cut their carbon footprint by 3.2 kilograms of CO2 – equivalent to the emissions from driving a car for 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) eating a serving of lamb or chocolate, or sending 800 emails.

When we compared the life cycle of each travel mode, taking into account the carbon generated by making the vehicle, fuelling it, and disposing of it, we found that emissions from cycling can be more than 30 times lower for each trip than driving a fossil fuel car, and about 10 times lower than driving an electric one.

We also estimate that urban residents who switched from driving to cycling for just one trip per day reduced their carbon footprint by about half a tonne of CO2 over the course of a year, and save the equivalent emissions of a one-way flight from London to New York.

If just one in five urban residents permanently changed their travel behavior in this way over the next few years, we estimate it would cut emissions from all car travel in Europe by about 8 percent.

Nearly half of the fall in daily carbon emissions during global lockdowns in 2020 came from reductions in transport emissions.

The pandemic forced countries around the world to adapt to reduce the spread of the virus. In the UK, walking and cycling have been the big winners, with a 20 percent rise in people walking regularly, and cycling levels increasing by 9 percent on weekdays and 58 percent on weekends compared to pre-pandemic levels. This is despite cycle commuters being very likely to work from home.

Active travel has offered an alternative to cars that keeps social distancing intact. It has helped people to stay safe during the pandemic and it could help reduce emissions as confinement is eased, particularly as the high prices of some electric vehicles are likely to put many potential buyers off for now.

So the race is on. Active travel can contribute to tackling the climate emergency earlier than electric vehicles while also providing affordable, reliable, clean, healthy, and congestion-busting transportation.

Christian Brand, Associate Professor in Transport, Energy & Environment, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

View Original Article

Site VisitorsMap

stink eye, n.

stink eye, n. A look or glare that expresses anger, disapproval, disgust, etc.; a dirty look.

Recent News

Site Statistics

314 registered users
4,765,342 words
5,659 posts, 2 comments
10251 images