3,866,747 words. 4,477 posts.

Your Blood Type May Affect COVID-19 Risk, But It’s No Kind of Protection, Experts Say

by | Jul 16, 2020 | New, News

Be the change that you wish to see in the world.

— Mahatma Gandhi

(Peter Dazeley/The Image Bank/Getty Images) HEALTH Your Blood Type May Affect COVID-19 Risk, But It's No Kind of Protection, Experts Say author logo AYLIN WOODWARD, BUSINESS INSIDER 16 JULY 2020

A handful of early studies have found that people with blood type O may have a slight advantage during this pandemic.

Research published over the weekend found that patients with type O were less likely to test positive for COVID-19 than patients with type A, B, or AB blood.

An April study found a similar trend: The research (though yet to be peer-reviewed) analysed 1,559 coronavirus patients in New York City and found that a lower proportion had type O blood.

Other research has reported a link between patients' blood type and the severity of their infections, but these two studies did not. Overall, the jury is still out on whether your blood type affects your coronavirus risk in any significant way.

"No one should think they're protected," Nicholas Tatonetti, the lead author of the April study, told the New York Times.

Blood type O is associated 'with a lower risk of testing positive'

The newest study on blood types examined nearly 1,300 coronavirus patients admitted to five hospitals in Massachusetts in March and April.

The results showed that blood type O "was associated with a lower risk of testing positive," the researchers said, while types B and AB came with a higher risk. Type A blood had no link to a patient's chance of a positive diagnosis.

The research aligns with previous findings.

In March, a study of 2,173 coronavirus patients at three hospitals in Wuhan and Shenzhen, China, also found that people with blood type O had a lower risk of infection.

A study published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine found an even more substantive link: Patients in Italy and Spain with blood type O had a 50 percent reduced risk of severe infection (cases requiring ventilation or supplemental oxygen) compared to patients with other blood types.

More specifically, the study authors found that a region of the participants' genomes that helps code for blood type was linked to a patient's chances of developing severe symptoms.

Research is split on whether any blood types are associated with higher risk

O is the most common blood type. About 48 percent of Americans have type O blood, according to the Oklahoma Blood Institute.

In general, your blood type depends on the presence or absence of proteins called A and B antigens on the surface of red blood cells. People with O blood have neither antigen. This genetic trait is inherited from our parents.

The New England Journal of Medicine study found that people with A antigens were 50 percent more likely to develop severe COVID-19 symptoms like respiratory failure.

Research into whether people with type A blood face a higher risk of getting infected in the first place doesn't paint a clear picture, however.

The study in China found that patients with blood type A were at higher risk for infection compared to people other blood types. The April research also found that a higher proportion of infected patients studied had blood type A.

But the new study found that people with types B and AB had "higher odds of testing positive."

Most researchers agree that it's too early to tell whether there's a strong link between blood type and infection risk.

Dr. Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, told the Associated Press last month that the evidence is "tentative … it isn't enough of a signal to be sure."

The link is so tenuous, in fact, that blood type shouldn't be one of the factors you use to assess your risk, experts say.

"I wouldn't even bring it up," Anahita Dua, a co-author of the new study, told the New York Times.

This article was originally published by Business Insider.

More from Business Insider:

  • The hackers who took over the Twitter accounts of Joe Biden and Elon Musk may have made off with as much as $120,000 worth of bitcoin — but we may never know for sure (TWTR)
  • REGTECH REVISITED: How the regtech landscape is evolving to address FIs' ever growing compliance needs
  • Locals are warning of whirlpools in the lake where Naya Rivera died, though authorities say it's unlikely. Here's how whirlpools form.
  • Twitter appears to have disabled tweeting by verified users after a massive hack and it's causing big problems (TWTR)
  • THE DIGITAL BANKING ECOSYSTEM: These are the key players, biggest shifts, and trends driving short- and long-term growth in one of the world's largest industries

View Original Article

Site VisitorsMap

rabbity, adj.

rabbity, adj. Resembling, characteristic of, or suggestive of a rabbit; containing many rabbits.

Recent News

Email and Slack Have Locked Us in a Productivity Paradox

In 1982, Time magazine skipped its annual tradition of naming a “Man of the Year” to instead crown the personal computer as the “Machine of the Year.” The Apple II had been released only a half-decade earlier, and the subsequent introduction of the V..

While Jack Dorsey Mans the Monastery

The day of January 6, when he hurled down the lightning bolt that cast Donald Trump out of Twitter and into outer darkness, should have been @jack's debut as an imperial overlord. But @jack never seems to flex. This can be maddening. Just when y..

Site Statistics

79 registered users
3,866,747 words
4,477 posts, 2 comments
8496 images